College Football Ratings · 2025

College Football Ratings — Week 4

96 FBS teams · 11 conferences · Through September 22, 2025 · Updated Jul 28, 11:22 PM ET

Home field worth 3.5 pts (estimated this season)

Team ratings

College football power ratings — SRS, strength of schedule, and Elo for every rated FBS team.
#TeamConfRecSRSSOSEloΔ Elo
1OregonBig Ten4–0+21.55-6.772095+1.4
2Ole MissSEC4–0+19.90+1.232031+22.5
3IndianaBig Ten4–0+19.49-5.501978+85.7
4MiamiACC4–0+17.88-0.131932+38.8
5TennesseeSEC3–1+16.81+0.401927+5.9
6USCBig Ten4–0+16.38-4.341869+17.9
7TexasSEC3–1+15.99-3.962023+3.9
8VanderbiltSEC4–0+15.02-9.281908+5.0
9OklahomaSEC4–0+14.04-0.981891+26.1
10MissouriSEC4–0+13.01-3.031943+26.9
11LSUSEC4–0+12.91-1.911981+4.3
12Arizona StateBig 123–1+11.45+0.831897+26.7
12ArkansasSEC2–2+11.45-1.321762-8.2
14MichiganBig Ten3–1+11.03+1.261891+23.5
15KansasBig 123–1+10.98-6.601814+42.1
16Texas TechBig 124–0+10.48-15.721813+110.2
17AuburnSEC3–1+10.10-1.271745-26.1
18IllinoisBig Ten3–1+9.88-4.021846-85.7
19Iowa StateBig 124–0+9.65-2.561918+0.0
20MemphisAmerican Athletic4–0+9.04-7.351886+8.2
21NebraskaBig Ten3–1+8.83-5.571700-23.5
22IowaBig Ten3–1+8.54-10.631854+60.7
23SMUACC2–2+8.47-3.231795-46.4
24Georgia TechACC4–0+8.30-4.261806+8.5
25UtahBig 123–1+7.99-7.581676-110.2
26South CarolinaSEC2–2+7.54+2.111780-26.9
27VirginiaACC3–1+6.68-10.101654+37.4
28ColoradoBig 122–2+6.57+0.151676+28.6
29FloridaSEC1–3+6.42+2.651768-38.8
29SyracuseACC3–1+6.42-1.351866+76.5
31North TexasAmerican Athletic4–0+6.41-7.041724+69.7
32MarylandBig Ten4–0+5.92-9.651721+75.8
33BaylorBig 122–2+5.88-0.491734-26.7
34Mississippi StateSEC4–0+4.84-10.011627+64.1
35ClemsonACC1–3+4.56+4.971729-76.5
36Kansas StateBig 121–3+4.26+3.101664+0.0
37South FloridaAmerican Athletic3–1+4.22+2.441713+27.7
38Texas StateSun Belt3–1+3.23-7.341694+9.4
39TulaneAmerican Athletic3–1+3.19+1.801751-22.5
40RutgersBig Ten3–1+2.57-8.901702-60.7
41ToledoMid-American2–2+2.19-8.041547-24.1
42East CarolinaAmerican Athletic2–2+0.55-6.701594-31.2
43NC StateACC3–1+0.41-0.191649-52.7
44OhioMid-American2–2+0.34+0.761792+8.7
45WisconsinBig Ten2–2+0.02-2.681551-75.8
46DukeACC2–2-0.05-0.851727+52.7
47Michigan StateBig Ten3–1-0.36-1.831608-17.9
48Virginia TechACC1–3-0.50+2.521523+21.7
49UNLVMountain West4–0-0.95-13.081840+15.8
50Fresno StateMountain West4–1-1.78-10.891667+20.2
51UConnFBS Independents2–2-1.98-9.941620+12.3
52MarshallSun Belt2–2-2.02-7.741789+4.7
53West VirginiaBig 122–2-2.03-4.571629-42.1
54UTSAAmerican Athletic2–2-2.08-1.961657+13.2
55Louisiana TechConference USA3–1-2.75-9.251565+34.6
56PurdueBig Ten2–2-2.80+2.511478-4.3
57Utah StateMountain West3–1-2.85-7.451580+16.3
58CaliforniaACC3–1-2.95-12.991608-154.7
59Jacksonville StateConference USA2–2-3.14-11.631618+4.4
60Bowling GreenMid-American2–2-3.54-2.591554-13.5
61Western KentuckyConference USA3–1-3.87-12.191549+19.9
62North CarolinaACC2–2-3.93-4.581560-73.2
63Missouri StateConference USA2–2-6.61-0.381592+19.8
64DelawareConference USA3–1-6.88-9.041636+53.4
64StanfordACC1–3-6.88+2.461459-37.4
66Washington StatePac-122–2-7.34+1.201526-30.5
67Georgia SouthernSun Belt2–2-7.58-3.701599+16.3
68TroySun Belt2–2-7.75-4.671621+52.2
69Western MichiganMid-American1–3-8.40+4.531384+24.1
70WyomingMountain West2–2-8.75-5.201473-28.6
71LouisianaSun Belt1–3-9.00-9.271513-60.1
72South AlabamaSun Belt1–3-9.19-6.481460-126.0
73TempleAmerican Athletic2–2-9.67-7.801404-8.5
74BuffaloMid-American2–2-10.00-17.611577-52.2
75LibertyConference USA1–3-10.26-6.821470-48.2
76Hawai'iMountain West3–2-10.39-8.361505-20.2
77RiceAmerican Athletic3–1-10.78-13.131506+59.3
78UABAmerican Athletic2–2-11.79-2.941447-5.9
79Florida InternationalConference USA2–2-12.08-8.431388-53.4
80UTEPConference USA1–3-12.10-5.511373-56.0
81Arkansas StateSun Belt1–3-12.21-3.661463-83.2
82AkronMid-American1–3-12.50-9.101398+96.4
83Southern MissSun Belt2–2-13.25-6.991434-34.6
84Central MichiganMid-American2–2-13.41-7.911359+17.0
85NevadaMountain West1–3-13.85-4.861300-19.9
86Oregon StatePac-120–4-13.99+6.821383-1.4
87TulsaAmerican Athletic2–2-14.03-9.441369+102.1
88Sam HoustonConference USA0–4-14.10+0.191453-3.9
89Coastal CarolinaSun Belt2–2-14.22-7.831510+126.0
90Kennesaw StateConference USA2–2-14.60-6.211348+83.2
91Georgia StateSun Belt1–3-14.78+2.671381-5.0
92Ball StateMid-American1–3-15.80-1.991362-12.3
93Eastern MichiganMid-American1–3-16.45-6.281303+60.1
94CharlotteAmerican Athletic1–3-20.16-10.061338-59.3
95Middle TennesseeConference USA1–3-22.88-6.761197-4.7
96Kent StateMid-American1–3-24.15-4.901146-5.8

Ratings are points relative to an average FBS team on a neutral field, so a difference between two teams is a projected spread. Ranks are re-based to the teams shown and are assigned on the displayed values, so teams with identical published ratings share a rank.

Conference strength

Average and best SRS rating per conference.
#ConferenceTeamsAvg SRSTop 25Best team
1SEC12+12.349Ole Miss+19.90
2Big Ten12+8.427Oregon+21.55
3Big 129+7.255Arizona State+11.45
4ACC12+3.203Miami+17.88
FBS Independents1-1.980UConn-1.98
5American Athletic11-4.101Memphis+9.04
6Mountain West6-6.430UNLV-0.95
7Sun Belt10-8.680Texas State+3.23
8Conference USA11-9.930Louisiana Tech-2.75
9Mid-American10-10.170Toledo+2.19
Pac-122-10.660Washington State-7.34

Leagues too small for a mean to mean anything are listed with their real numbers but are not ranked — a three-team independents bucket is not a league, and ranking it would say more about who happens to be in it than about its strength.

This week's movers

Risers

  • Coastal CarolinaSun Belt+126.0
  • Texas TechBig 12+110.2
  • TulsaAmerican Athletic+102.1
  • AkronMid-American+96.4
  • IndianaBig Ten+85.7

Fallers

  • CaliforniaACC-154.7
  • South AlabamaSun Belt-126.0
  • UtahBig 12-110.2
  • IllinoisBig Ten-85.7
  • Arkansas StateSun Belt-83.2

Change in Elo rating over this week's games.

Next week's projected margins

SRS-implied margins for next week's games.
GameProjectionHome win %
LSU at Ole MissOle Miss by 10.474%
Indiana at IowaIndiana by 7.532%
USC at IllinoisUSC by 3.043%
Tennessee at Mississippi StateTennessee by 8.530%
Utah State at VanderbiltVanderbilt by 21.391%
Duke at SyracuseSyracuse by 9.973%
Utah at West VirginiaUtah by 6.634%
Virginia Tech at NC StateNC State by 4.461%
South Alabama at North TexasNorth Texas by 19.188%
Bowling Green at OhioOhio by 7.368%
Akron at ToledoToledo by 18.187%
Western Kentucky at Missouri StateMissouri State by 0.752%
Tulane at TulsaTulane by 13.820%
Marshall at LouisianaMarshall by 3.541%
UConn at BuffaloUConn by 4.639%
Louisiana Tech at UTEPLouisiana Tech by 5.936%
Jacksonville State at Southern MissJacksonville State by 6.734%
Eastern Michigan at Central MichiganCentral Michigan by 6.566%
Middle Tennessee at Kennesaw StateKennesaw State by 11.777%

These ratings already include this week's results, so they project next week's games — projecting this week's with them would be reporting the past as a forecast. Games where either side is unrated are omitted rather than projected off a missing rating. Context, not betting advice.

Methodology
  • These ratings are computed here from final scores — they are not a republished third-party rating. Nothing on this page comes from a subscription or permission-gated system.
  • SRS is a ridge-regularized least-squares fit: each team's rating is chosen so that (home rating - away rating + home-field) best predicts the margin of every game played. It is a whole-season simultaneous solve, so a late upset re-weighs the entire season.
  • Elo walks the games in date order and updates after each one, with diminishing credit for blowouts. It reacts to a team improving mid-season in a way a season-long average cannot, and it carries a regressed rating in from last season.
  • Ratings are points relative to an average FBS team on a neutral field, so a difference between two teams is a projected spread.
  • Home-field advantage is ESTIMATED from the season's own games rather than assumed. Measured home margin has ranged from about 2 points (2020, no crowds) to nearly 8 by season, so a fixed constant would be wrong in both directions.
  • Strength of schedule is the average rating of the opponents a team actually played. Teams below Division I are pooled into a single opponent, so scheduling one cannot inflate a schedule rating.
  • Blowouts are capped before they enter the fit, so a 63-0 win counts as a decisive win rather than four times a 17-0 win.
  • Teams with fewer than four completed games are not rated: with a shorter schedule the rating reflects the prior more than the season.
  • Validated walk-forward on 3,867 held-out games (2018-2025), fitting only on games played before each week: SRS predicted game margin to 12.7 points mean absolute error, against 13.5 for the same model with the schedule adjustment removed and 16.1 for assuming the home team wins.
What these numbers can't tell you
  • These ratings see final scores only — no injuries, no weather, no personnel changes, no market information. A team missing its starting quarterback is rated exactly as if it were not.
  • The consensus betting market predicted the same held-out games better (12.1 vs 12.7 mean absolute error). Projected margins here are context, not betting advice, and should not be read as an edge.
  • Early-season ratings are unstable by construction. Through the first month a rating rests on three or four results and will move sharply; treat November's ratings as far more settled than September's.
  • FCS teams are rated internally because FBS teams play them, but are not listed. A rating is only comparable within the population it was anchored on.

FACT (final scores, schedule, site, conference affiliation), DERIVED (SRS, Elo, strength of schedule, projected margins)

Fitted constants
margin_cap
35
ridge
0.25
prior_weight
2
elo_k
46
elo_hfa
60
elo_carry
0.87
elo_epoch_season
2002
min_games_to_rank
4
More for this week