NFL · power ratings · 2017 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2017-10-30
- Games absorbed
- 119
- season to date · 13 this week
- Home field
- 0.89
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 6-2 | 6.53 | 1.58 | 68% | 1645 | +10.1 |
| 2 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 6-2 | 6.00 | 1.11 | 67% | 1667 | +7.7 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 6-2 | 4.31 | -0.11 | 62% | 1609 | +17.1 |
| 4 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 7-1 | 4.22 | -0.85 | 62% | 1606 | +6.2 |
| 5 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 5-2 | 3.52 | 0.97 | 60% | 1592 | +9.4 |
| 6 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 6-2 | 3.13 | -0.34 | 59% | 1560 | +9.1 |
| 7 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 4-3 | 2.83 | -1.70 | 58% | 1574 | +28.5 |
| 8 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 5-2 | 2.58 | -2.16 | 57% | 1592 | +7.8 |
| 9 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 5-2 | 2.42 | -0.51 | 57% | 1555 | +19.9 |
| 10 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 4-3 | 2.41 | 0.27 | 57% | 1580 | +14.7 |
| 11 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 4-3 | 1.68 | 1.51 | 55% | 1541 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 5-3 | 1.29 | 0.63 | 54% | 1521 | +30.0 |
| 13 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 4-3 | 0.80 | -0.78 | 52% | 1509 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 3-4 | 0.60 | 1.22 | 52% | 1500 | -17.1 |
| 15 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 4-4 | 0.44 | -1.06 | 51% | 1496 | +35.2 |
| 16 | Los Angeles RamsLA | NFC | 5-2 | 0.20 | -1.59 | 51% | 1519 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 3-4 | 0.19 | 0.69 | 51% | 1488 | -7.8 |
| 18 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 3-4 | 0.01 | 1.11 | 50% | 1476 | -10.1 |
| 19 | Los Angeles ChargersLAC | AFC | 3-5 | -0.10 | 1.23 | 50% | 1464 | -7.7 |
| 20 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 3-4 | -0.72 | 1.41 | 48% | 1473 | -28.5 |
| 21 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 3-4 | -1.11 | -0.80 | 47% | 1474 | +4.0 |
| 22 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 3-5 | -1.23 | 0.52 | 46% | 1462 | -19.9 |
| 23 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 4-3 | -1.49 | -2.20 | 46% | 1482 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 2-5 | -2.00 | 0.56 | 44% | 1433 | -30.0 |
| 25 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 1-6 | -2.60 | 1.16 | 42% | 1447 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 3-5 | -2.78 | 1.85 | 42% | 1427 | -9.4 |
| 27 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 3-5 | -2.94 | -0.53 | 42% | 1435 | -14.7 |
| 28 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 4-3 | -3.09 | -0.16 | 41% | 1470 | -35.2 |
| 29 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 3-4 | -3.52 | -1.03 | 40% | 1450 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 2-6 | -6.17 | -2.24 | 33% | 1385 | -4.0 |
| 31 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 0-8 | -6.91 | 0.09 | 31% | 1295 | -6.2 |
| 32 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 0-8 | -8.49 | -0.46 | 27% | 1275 | -9.1 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.24 | Kansas City Chiefs6.53 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.24 | Philadelphia Eagles4.22 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Baltimore Ravens+35.21496
- Carolina Panthers+30.01521
- Dallas Cowboys+28.51574
- Buffalo Bills+19.91555
- Pittsburgh Steelers+17.11609
Fallers
- Miami Dolphins-35.21470
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers-30.01433
- Washington Redskins-28.51473
- Oakland Raiders-19.91462
- Detroit Lions-17.11500
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games