NFL · power ratings · 2017 week 19
What we knew after week 19
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2018-01-14
- Games absorbed
- 264
- season to date · 4 this week
- Home field
- 1.89
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 14-3 | 7.96 | -0.29 | 72% | 1725 | +9.4 |
| 2 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 14-3 | 5.71 | 0.29 | 66% | 1675 | +12.8 |
| 3 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 14-3 | 5.12 | -0.24 | 65% | 1654 | +15.1 |
| 4 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 12-6 | 4.72 | 1.29 | 63% | 1618 | -12.8 |
| 5 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 11-7 | 4.19 | 1.46 | 62% | 1635 | -15.1 |
| 6 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 10-7 | 3.95 | -0.30 | 61% | 1589 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 13-4 | 3.87 | -0.63 | 61% | 1631 | -22.1 |
| 8 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 11-6 | 2.46 | 1.50 | 57% | 1564 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 12-6 | 2.09 | -1.54 | 56% | 1560 | +22.1 |
| 10 | Los Angeles ChargersLAC | AFC | 9-7 | 2.09 | -0.43 | 56% | 1563 | 0.0 |
| 11 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 9-7 | 2.01 | -0.79 | 56% | 1555 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 9-7 | 2.01 | -1.66 | 56% | 1549 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 9-7 | 1.95 | 0.07 | 56% | 1559 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Los Angeles RamsLA | NFC | 11-6 | 1.55 | -0.01 | 54% | 1541 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 9-7 | 1.31 | 0.10 | 54% | 1527 | 0.0 |
| 16 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 9-8 | -0.69 | 0.49 | 48% | 1494 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 7-9 | -1.05 | 0.90 | 47% | 1449 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 7-9 | -1.12 | 1.08 | 47% | 1445 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 10-8 | -1.43 | -0.91 | 46% | 1493 | -9.4 |
| 20 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 5-11 | -1.50 | 1.26 | 46% | 1446 | 0.0 |
| 21 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 8-8 | -2.18 | -0.47 | 44% | 1466 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 6-10 | -2.26 | 0.60 | 43% | 1437 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 7-9 | -2.30 | -0.97 | 43% | 1456 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 5-11 | -2.41 | 1.11 | 43% | 1417 | 0.0 |
| 25 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 5-11 | -2.54 | 0.12 | 43% | 1412 | 0.0 |
| 26 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 5-11 | -3.23 | 0.74 | 41% | 1392 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 6-10 | -3.28 | 1.24 | 41% | 1415 | 0.0 |
| 28 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 6-10 | -3.37 | -0.30 | 40% | 1459 | 0.0 |
| 29 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 4-12 | -4.13 | -0.34 | 38% | 1343 | 0.0 |
| 30 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 3-13 | -4.72 | 0.69 | 37% | 1359 | 0.0 |
| 31 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 4-12 | -5.47 | -1.12 | 35% | 1356 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 0-16 | -9.31 | 0.04 | 25% | 1214 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.79 | New England Patriots7.96 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.79 | Minnesota Vikings5.71 |
Week 19 movers
Risers
- Jacksonville Jaguars+22.11560
- Philadelphia Eagles+15.11654
- Minnesota Vikings+12.81675
- New England Patriots+9.41725
Fallers
- Pittsburgh Steelers-22.11631
- Atlanta Falcons-15.11635
- New Orleans Saints-12.81618
- Tennessee Titans-9.41493
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 19.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games