NFL · power ratings · 2016 week 8

What we knew after week 8

Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.

Teams rated
32
through 2016-10-31
Games absorbed
120
season to date · 13 this week
Home field
2.16
points, the model's estimate this week

Team ratings

NFL power ratings after week 8 of 2016 — SRS, strength of schedule and Elo for every rated team.
#TeamConfRecSRSSOSWin%EloΔ Elo
1New England PatriotsNEAFC7-17.280.3170%1663+27.9
2Denver BroncosDENAFC6-25.42-0.0865%1623+10.1
3Kansas City ChiefsKCAFC5-24.76-0.4864%1626+22.0
4Minnesota VikingsMINNFC5-23.72-0.4561%1573-38.3
5Pittsburgh SteelersPITAFC4-33.601.6360%15490.0
6Seattle SeahawksSEANFC4-2-13.43-1.2160%1596-25.5
7Philadelphia EaglesPHINFC4-33.05-0.4159%1552-15.8
8Arizona CardinalsARINFC3-4-12.890.2058%1549-24.1
9Dallas CowboysDALNFC6-12.71-0.7858%1581+15.8
10Green Bay PackersGBNFC4-32.46-0.6057%1551-5.8
11Buffalo BillsBUFAFC4-42.380.4257%1543-27.9
12Atlanta FalconsATLNFC5-32.281.1257%1551+5.8
13Carolina PanthersCARNFC2-51.610.5355%1536+24.1
14Cincinnati BengalsCINAFC3-4-11.080.9453%1509-0.0
15San Diego ChargersSDAFC3-50.580.8352%1471-10.1
16Oakland RaidersOAKAFC6-2-0.21-1.2049%1510+21.5
17Washington RedskinsWASNFC4-3-1-0.84-0.0448%1509+0.0
18New York GiantsNYGNFC4-3-0.860.3848%14880.0
19Houston TexansHOUAFC5-3-1.091.1147%1520+16.9
20Detroit LionsDETNFC4-4-1.20-1.1947%1489-16.9
21New Orleans SaintsNONFC3-4-1.461.6646%1463+25.5
22Baltimore RavensBALAFC3-4-1.90-2.1444%14470.0
23New York JetsNYJAFC3-5-1.941.1844%1484+9.7
24Miami DolphinsMIAAFC3-4-1.950.9644%14530.0
25Los Angeles RamsLANFC3-4-2.01-0.3644%14560.0
26Indianapolis ColtsINDAFC3-5-2.81-0.8242%1451-22.0
27Tampa Bay BuccaneersTBNFC3-4-2.870.5342%1438-21.5
28Chicago BearsCHINFC2-6-4.070.0138%1413+38.3
29Tennessee TitansTENAFC4-4-4.21-2.1338%1395+21.4
30San Francisco 49ersSFNFC1-6-6.271.1632%13560.0
31Jacksonville JaguarsJAXAFC2-5-6.76-1.4531%1347-21.4
32Cleveland BrownsCLEAFC0-8-6.780.0731%1310-9.7

Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.

Conference strength

Mean SRS by conference after week 8 of 2016.
ConferenceTeamsAvg SRSBest team
AFC16-0.16New England Patriots7.28
NFC160.16Minnesota Vikings3.72

Week 8 movers

Risers

  • Chicago Bears+38.31413
  • New England Patriots+27.91663
  • New Orleans Saints+25.51463
  • Carolina Panthers+24.11536
  • Kansas City Chiefs+22.01626

Fallers

  • Minnesota Vikings-38.31573
  • Buffalo Bills-27.91543
  • Seattle Seahawks-25.51596
  • Arizona Cardinals-24.11549
  • Indianapolis Colts-22.01451

Methodology

SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.

Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.

These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.

Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”

Fitted constants

elo_carry
0.55
elo_epoch_season
1999
elo_hfa
60
elo_k
20
elo_points_per_elo
0.04
margin_cap
17
min_games_to_rank
3
prior_weight
2
ridge
4
srs_carry
0.8

Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games