NFL · power ratings · 2016 week 21
What we knew after week 21
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2017-02-05
- Games absorbed
- 267
- season to date · 1 this week
- Home field
- 2.24
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 17-2 | 8.29 | -0.45 | 73% | 1765 | +15.3 |
| 2 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 13-6 | 5.74 | 1.00 | 66% | 1667 | -15.3 |
| 3 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 12-5 | 4.75 | 0.43 | 64% | 1654 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 13-6 | 4.05 | 0.61 | 62% | 1634 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 9-7 | 3.58 | 0.94 | 60% | 1567 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 11-6-1 | 3.29 | -0.22 | 59% | 1587 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 13-4 | 3.29 | -0.41 | 59% | 1599 | 0.0 |
| 8 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 12-7 | 2.73 | 0.10 | 58% | 1619 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 6-9-1 | 1.89 | 0.17 | 55% | 1511 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 7-8-1 | 1.54 | -0.46 | 54% | 1538 | 0.0 |
| 11 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 7-9 | 1.23 | 0.73 | 54% | 1510 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 8-8 | 1.07 | -0.67 | 53% | 1487 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 12-5 | 0.98 | 0.51 | 53% | 1541 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 6-10 | 0.87 | 0.74 | 53% | 1524 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 8-7-1 | 0.33 | 0.42 | 51% | 1501 | 0.0 |
| 16 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 11-6 | 0.23 | 0.13 | 51% | 1540 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 7-9 | 0.20 | -0.41 | 51% | 1466 | 0.0 |
| 18 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 7-9 | -0.02 | 0.69 | 50% | 1493 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 8-8 | -0.10 | 0.05 | 50% | 1480 | 0.0 |
| 20 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 9-7 | -0.83 | 0.74 | 48% | 1508 | 0.0 |
| 21 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 5-11 | -1.09 | 0.30 | 47% | 1404 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 8-8 | -1.13 | -0.75 | 47% | 1514 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 10-7 | -1.42 | 0.07 | 46% | 1507 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 9-8 | -1.44 | -0.58 | 46% | 1492 | 0.0 |
| 25 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 10-8 | -1.56 | 0.42 | 45% | 1497 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 9-7 | -2.46 | -1.22 | 43% | 1448 | 0.0 |
| 27 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 5-11 | -3.32 | 0.50 | 40% | 1419 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 3-13 | -4.97 | -0.31 | 36% | 1332 | 0.0 |
| 29 | Los Angeles RamsLA | NFC | 4-12 | -5.06 | 0.21 | 36% | 1340 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 3-13 | -5.34 | -0.53 | 35% | 1325 | 0.0 |
| 31 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 2-14 | -7.34 | 0.44 | 30% | 1275 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 1-15 | -7.99 | 1.06 | 28% | 1256 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.02 | New England Patriots8.29 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.02 | Atlanta Falcons5.74 |
Week 21 movers
Risers
- New England Patriots+15.31765
Fallers
- Atlanta Falcons-15.31667
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 21.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games