NFL · power ratings · 2015 week 21
What we knew after week 21
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2016-02-07
- Games absorbed
- 267
- season to date · 1 this week
- Home field
- 1.13
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 11-7 | 6.42 | 1.27 | 68% | 1678 | 0.0 |
| 2 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 13-5 | 5.91 | -0.39 | 67% | 1638 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 14-4 | 5.88 | 1.05 | 67% | 1654 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 15-4 | 5.57 | 1.72 | 66% | 1689 | +33.3 |
| 5 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 12-5 | 5.51 | 0.91 | 66% | 1606 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 17-2 | 5.50 | -0.75 | 66% | 1690 | -33.3 |
| 7 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 12-6 | 5.42 | 1.03 | 65% | 1669 | 0.0 |
| 8 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 11-7 | 4.64 | 1.28 | 63% | 1608 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 11-7 | 4.47 | 1.57 | 63% | 1622 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 11-6 | 3.19 | 1.39 | 59% | 1592 | 0.0 |
| 11 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 10-6 | 0.84 | -1.57 | 52% | 1532 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 8-8 | 0.40 | -0.38 | 51% | 1523 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 7-9 | -0.07 | 1.41 | 50% | 1494 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 9-8 | -0.37 | -0.87 | 49% | 1506 | 0.0 |
| 15 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 7-9 | -1.02 | 1.20 | 47% | 1462 | 0.0 |
| 16 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 7-9 | -1.17 | -0.53 | 47% | 1473 | 0.0 |
| 17 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 6-10 | -1.22 | -0.91 | 46% | 1449 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 5-11 | -1.23 | 0.94 | 46% | 1448 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 8-8 | -1.67 | -1.84 | 45% | 1477 | 0.0 |
| 20 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 8-8 | -1.80 | -1.14 | 45% | 1467 | 0.0 |
| 21 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 4-12 | -1.83 | 1.13 | 45% | 1399 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 6-10 | -1.89 | 1.42 | 45% | 1413 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 7-9 | -2.01 | 1.31 | 44% | 1434 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 9-8 | -2.34 | -0.60 | 43% | 1496 | 0.0 |
| 25 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 7-9 | -2.99 | -1.28 | 41% | 1442 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 4-12 | -3.17 | 0.05 | 41% | 1407 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 6-10 | -3.53 | -0.77 | 40% | 1403 | 0.0 |
| 28 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 5-11 | -3.65 | 1.82 | 40% | 1391 | 0.0 |
| 29 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 3-13 | -5.17 | 1.59 | 35% | 1341 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 6-10 | -5.23 | -1.54 | 35% | 1372 | 0.0 |
| 31 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 5-11 | -5.77 | -1.47 | 34% | 1341 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 3-13 | -7.63 | -1.49 | 29% | 1284 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.08 | New England Patriots5.91 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.08 | Seattle Seahawks6.42 |
Week 21 movers
Risers
- Denver Broncos+33.31689
Fallers
- Carolina Panthers-33.31690
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 21.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games