NFL · power ratings · 2015 week 18
What we knew after week 18
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2016-01-10
- Games absorbed
- 260
- season to date · 4 this week
- Home field
- 0.99
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 11-6 | 6.81 | 1.16 | 69% | 1696 | +6.2 |
| 2 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 13-3 | 6.54 | 0.68 | 68% | 1668 | 0.0 |
| 3 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 12-4 | 5.66 | -1.20 | 66% | 1626 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 12-5 | 5.59 | 0.66 | 66% | 1690 | +26.6 |
| 5 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 12-5 | 5.58 | 0.99 | 66% | 1606 | -12.9 |
| 6 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 15-1 | 5.08 | -2.02 | 64% | 1678 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 11-6 | 4.81 | 1.04 | 64% | 1621 | +28.0 |
| 8 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 11-6 | 4.70 | 1.37 | 63% | 1639 | +12.9 |
| 9 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 12-4 | 4.70 | 1.08 | 63% | 1629 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 11-6 | 3.25 | 1.48 | 59% | 1592 | -6.2 |
| 11 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 10-6 | 0.80 | -1.63 | 52% | 1532 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 8-8 | 0.37 | -0.43 | 51% | 1523 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 7-9 | -0.01 | 1.47 | 50% | 1494 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 9-8 | -0.41 | -0.93 | 49% | 1506 | -26.6 |
| 15 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 7-9 | -0.89 | 1.39 | 47% | 1462 | 0.0 |
| 16 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 5-11 | -1.18 | 1.01 | 47% | 1448 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 7-9 | -1.19 | -0.55 | 47% | 1473 | 0.0 |
| 18 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 6-10 | -1.26 | -0.97 | 46% | 1449 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 8-8 | -1.72 | -1.91 | 45% | 1477 | 0.0 |
| 20 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 6-10 | -1.84 | 1.49 | 45% | 1413 | 0.0 |
| 21 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 4-12 | -1.87 | 1.08 | 45% | 1399 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 8-8 | -1.89 | -1.26 | 45% | 1467 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 7-9 | -2.05 | 1.26 | 44% | 1434 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 9-8 | -2.37 | -0.64 | 43% | 1496 | -28.0 |
| 25 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 7-9 | -3.02 | -1.32 | 41% | 1442 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 4-12 | -3.19 | 0.02 | 41% | 1407 | 0.0 |
| 27 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 5-11 | -3.51 | 2.01 | 40% | 1391 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 6-10 | -3.58 | -0.82 | 40% | 1403 | 0.0 |
| 29 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 3-13 | -5.12 | 1.67 | 35% | 1341 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 6-10 | -5.29 | -1.62 | 35% | 1372 | 0.0 |
| 31 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 5-11 | -5.83 | -1.54 | 34% | 1341 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 3-13 | -7.68 | -1.57 | 29% | 1284 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.14 | New England Patriots5.66 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.14 | Seattle Seahawks6.81 |
Week 18 movers
Risers
- Green Bay Packers+28.01621
- Kansas City Chiefs+26.61690
- Pittsburgh Steelers+12.91639
- Seattle Seahawks+6.21696
Fallers
- Washington Redskins-28.01496
- Houston Texans-26.61506
- Cincinnati Bengals-12.91606
- Minnesota Vikings-6.21592
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 18.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games