NFL · power ratings · 2013 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2013-10-28
- Games absorbed
- 120
- season to date · 13 this week
- Home field
- 2.45
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 7-1 | 7.33 | -1.94 | 70% | 1658 | +11.6 |
| 2 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 5-2 | 6.18 | 0.34 | 67% | 1623 | +16.4 |
| 3 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 7-1 | 5.72 | -0.91 | 66% | 1660 | +10.9 |
| 4 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 6-2 | 5.09 | -0.40 | 64% | 1631 | +6.7 |
| 5 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 6-1 | 4.92 | -0.48 | 64% | 1612 | +11.6 |
| 6 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 6-2 | 4.16 | -0.94 | 62% | 1623 | +11.6 |
| 7 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 6-2 | 2.98 | 0.15 | 59% | 1595 | +16.3 |
| 8 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 4-3 | 2.75 | -1.49 | 58% | 1567 | +20.3 |
| 9 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 4-4 | 2.56 | -0.00 | 57% | 1531 | -6.3 |
| 10 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 3-4 | 2.25 | 0.50 | 56% | 1567 | 0.0 |
| 11 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 5-2 | 1.93 | 0.47 | 56% | 1576 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 4-3 | 1.45 | -0.16 | 54% | 1512 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 5-3 | 1.07 | 0.43 | 53% | 1509 | +6.3 |
| 14 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 8-0 | 0.66 | -2.99 | 52% | 1542 | +10.4 |
| 15 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 4-3 | 0.53 | -2.44 | 52% | 1514 | 0.0 |
| 16 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 2-5 | -0.28 | -0.38 | 49% | 1493 | -28.9 |
| 17 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 3-4 | -0.40 | 1.01 | 49% | 1479 | -11.6 |
| 18 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 4-4 | -0.68 | 1.52 | 48% | 1471 | +28.9 |
| 19 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 2-5 | -1.47 | 1.41 | 46% | 1458 | 0.0 |
| 20 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 2-6 | -1.90 | 0.62 | 45% | 1449 | +27.0 |
| 21 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 3-4 | -2.04 | 0.68 | 44% | 1452 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 2-5 | -2.21 | -1.01 | 44% | 1457 | -14.4 |
| 23 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 2-5 | -2.32 | 1.58 | 43% | 1454 | -11.6 |
| 24 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 3-5 | -2.34 | 0.40 | 43% | 1449 | -10.9 |
| 25 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 3-5 | -2.84 | 1.25 | 42% | 1426 | -11.6 |
| 26 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 3-5 | -3.06 | 0.78 | 41% | 1422 | -10.4 |
| 27 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 3-5 | -3.06 | 0.03 | 41% | 1403 | -27.0 |
| 28 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 4-4 | -3.58 | -0.10 | 40% | 1421 | -16.3 |
| 29 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 1-6 | -3.65 | 0.61 | 40% | 1406 | -16.4 |
| 30 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 3-4 | -4.46 | -0.66 | 37% | 1414 | +14.4 |
| 31 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 0-7 | -4.75 | 0.60 | 36% | 1367 | -20.3 |
| 32 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 0-8 | -10.52 | 1.81 | 22% | 1257 | -6.7 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | -0.67 | Denver Broncos7.33 |
| NFC | 16 | 0.67 | Green Bay Packers6.18 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Arizona Cardinals+28.91471
- New York Giants+27.01449
- Carolina Panthers+20.31567
- Green Bay Packers+16.41623
- Cincinnati Bengals+16.31595
Fallers
- Atlanta Falcons-28.91493
- Philadelphia Eagles-27.01403
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers-20.31367
- Minnesota Vikings-16.41406
- New York Jets-16.31421
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games