NFL · power ratings · 2010 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2010-11-01
- Games absorbed
- 117
- season to date · 13 this week
- Home field
- 1.86
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 6-1 | 5.23 | 1.04 | 65% | 1625 | +13.5 |
| 2 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 5-2 | 4.90 | 1.09 | 64% | 1613 | -34.7 |
| 3 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 5-2 | 4.83 | -1.08 | 64% | 1621 | +14.5 |
| 4 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 5-2 | 4.48 | 1.02 | 63% | 1584 | -22.9 |
| 5 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 5-3 | 4.08 | 0.25 | 62% | 1575 | -24.3 |
| 6 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 5-2 | 3.62 | 0.51 | 60% | 1583 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 5-3 | 3.46 | -0.06 | 60% | 1593 | +34.7 |
| 8 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 5-3 | 2.40 | -0.89 | 57% | 1584 | +22.9 |
| 9 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 5-2 | 2.32 | 0.01 | 57% | 1575 | 0.0 |
| 10 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 4-3 | 2.21 | -0.12 | 56% | 1551 | 0.0 |
| 11 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 5-2 | 1.95 | -0.18 | 56% | 1565 | 0.0 |
| 12 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 3-5 | 1.89 | -0.73 | 55% | 1533 | +24.3 |
| 13 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 2-5 | 1.79 | 1.78 | 55% | 1512 | -13.5 |
| 14 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 4-3 | 0.49 | 2.07 | 51% | 1510 | +26.2 |
| 15 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 5-2 | -0.22 | -0.92 | 49% | 1491 | +7.2 |
| 16 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 4-3 | -0.37 | -1.33 | 49% | 1490 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 1-6 | -0.60 | 0.26 | 48% | 1450 | -43.8 |
| 18 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 4-3 | -0.80 | 0.96 | 48% | 1499 | -14.5 |
| 19 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 2-5 | -1.25 | 0.12 | 46% | 1454 | -26.2 |
| 20 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 4-4 | -1.92 | 0.22 | 44% | 1444 | -31.3 |
| 21 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 4-4 | -2.14 | -1.24 | 44% | 1476 | +30.6 |
| 22 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 2-6 | -2.40 | -0.88 | 43% | 1440 | +20.7 |
| 23 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 3-4 | -2.50 | -0.83 | 43% | 1469 | -18.2 |
| 24 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 2-6 | -2.83 | 0.77 | 42% | 1381 | -20.7 |
| 25 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 2-5 | -2.85 | 1.20 | 42% | 1450 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 5-2 | -2.94 | -1.18 | 42% | 1473 | +18.2 |
| 27 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 4-4 | -2.95 | 0.65 | 42% | 1455 | +43.8 |
| 28 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 2-5 | -3.40 | 0.51 | 40% | 1383 | +31.3 |
| 29 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 4-4 | -3.56 | -2.47 | 40% | 1399 | +23.6 |
| 30 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 4-3 | -3.77 | -1.70 | 39% | 1442 | -30.6 |
| 31 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 0-7 | -4.15 | 2.08 | 38% | 1370 | -7.2 |
| 32 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 1-6 | -5.00 | -0.88 | 36% | 1408 | -23.6 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 0.77 | New England Patriots5.23 |
| NFC | 16 | -0.77 | Green Bay Packers3.46 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Jacksonville Jaguars+43.81455
- Green Bay Packers+34.71593
- Detroit Lions+31.31383
- Oakland Raiders+30.61476
- Miami Dolphins+26.21510
Fallers
- Dallas Cowboys-43.81450
- New York Jets-34.71613
- Washington Redskins-31.31444
- Seattle Seahawks-30.61442
- Cincinnati Bengals-26.21454
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games