NFL · power ratings · 2010 week 19
What we knew after week 19
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2011-01-16
- Games absorbed
- 264
- season to date · 4 this week
- Home field
- 1.50
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 14-3 | 7.35 | 1.58 | 70% | 1700 | -33.0 |
| 2 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 12-6 | 6.55 | 1.07 | 68% | 1695 | +39.8 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 13-4 | 5.61 | 0.77 | 66% | 1648 | +19.7 |
| 4 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 13-5 | 5.17 | 0.52 | 65% | 1652 | -19.7 |
| 5 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 13-5 | 5.00 | 1.45 | 64% | 1653 | +33.0 |
| 6 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 13-4 | 3.71 | -0.38 | 61% | 1612 | -39.8 |
| 7 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 10-7 | 3.02 | 0.14 | 59% | 1586 | 0.0 |
| 8 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 10-7 | 2.93 | 0.78 | 58% | 1565 | 0.0 |
| 9 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 11-6 | 2.55 | -1.48 | 57% | 1578 | 0.0 |
| 10 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 9-7 | 2.51 | -1.69 | 57% | 1567 | 0.0 |
| 11 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 12-5 | 2.47 | 0.12 | 57% | 1594 | +9.8 |
| 12 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 10-6 | 1.54 | -0.26 | 54% | 1547 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 6-10 | 0.52 | 0.44 | 51% | 1501 | 0.0 |
| 14 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 6-10 | 0.31 | 0.16 | 51% | 1447 | 0.0 |
| 15 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 6-10 | -0.27 | 1.36 | 49% | 1471 | 0.0 |
| 16 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 10-6 | -0.33 | -1.20 | 49% | 1532 | 0.0 |
| 17 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 7-9 | -0.42 | 1.92 | 49% | 1461 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 6-10 | -0.83 | 0.62 | 48% | 1456 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 10-7 | -1.02 | -1.50 | 47% | 1466 | 0.0 |
| 20 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 8-8 | -1.51 | -1.20 | 46% | 1511 | 0.0 |
| 21 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 4-12 | -2.00 | 1.87 | 44% | 1416 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 6-10 | -2.12 | 1.50 | 44% | 1439 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 5-11 | -2.31 | 1.34 | 43% | 1412 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 8-8 | -2.45 | -0.14 | 43% | 1455 | 0.0 |
| 25 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 6-10 | -2.54 | 0.73 | 43% | 1403 | 0.0 |
| 26 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 6-10 | -2.73 | -1.76 | 42% | 1446 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 4-12 | -2.95 | 2.09 | 42% | 1403 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 4-12 | -4.45 | -0.52 | 37% | 1329 | 0.0 |
| 29 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 7-9 | -4.63 | -2.40 | 37% | 1386 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 8-10 | -5.16 | -1.32 | 35% | 1412 | -9.8 |
| 31 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 5-11 | -6.01 | -1.92 | 33% | 1334 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 2-14 | -7.46 | 0.24 | 29% | 1326 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 0.69 | New England Patriots7.35 |
| NFC | 16 | -0.69 | Green Bay Packers6.55 |
Week 19 movers
Risers
- Green Bay Packers+39.81695
- New York Jets+33.01653
- Pittsburgh Steelers+19.71648
- Chicago Bears+9.81594
Fallers
- Atlanta Falcons-39.81612
- New England Patriots-33.01700
- Baltimore Ravens-19.71652
- Seattle Seahawks-9.81412
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 19.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games