NFL · power ratings · 2009 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2009-11-02
- Games absorbed
- 116
- season to date · 13 this week
- Home field
- 0.89
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 7-0 | 8.13 | 0.01 | 72% | 1677 | +11.6 |
| 2 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 7-0 | 6.47 | -2.34 | 68% | 1679 | +4.9 |
| 3 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 4-3 | 5.33 | 0.23 | 65% | 1604 | +26.7 |
| 4 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 5-2 | 5.33 | 0.35 | 65% | 1620 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 5-2 | 5.24 | -1.89 | 65% | 1606 | +25.6 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 5-2 | 4.62 | -1.16 | 63% | 1639 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 5-2 | 4.36 | -1.54 | 62% | 1589 | +13.1 |
| 8 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 7-1 | 4.19 | -1.42 | 62% | 1618 | +25.6 |
| 9 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 6-1 | 2.52 | 0.67 | 57% | 1562 | -26.7 |
| 10 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 5-3 | 2.42 | -0.42 | 57% | 1554 | -25.6 |
| 11 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 4-3 | 1.92 | -2.06 | 56% | 1507 | -25.6 |
| 12 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 4-3 | 1.75 | 2.31 | 55% | 1552 | -11.6 |
| 13 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 4-3 | 1.74 | -0.87 | 55% | 1545 | +8.6 |
| 14 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 4-4 | 1.63 | 0.59 | 55% | 1510 | -24.6 |
| 15 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 4-3 | 1.19 | 0.04 | 53% | 1543 | -43.4 |
| 16 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 4-3 | 0.82 | -1.44 | 52% | 1511 | +13.9 |
| 17 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 5-2 | 0.59 | 1.32 | 52% | 1516 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 5-3 | 0.59 | -1.18 | 52% | 1540 | +32.6 |
| 19 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 3-4 | -0.06 | 2.69 | 50% | 1509 | +24.6 |
| 20 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 1-6 | -0.54 | 1.89 | 48% | 1473 | +23.9 |
| 21 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 3-4 | -0.92 | 0.12 | 47% | 1456 | -4.9 |
| 22 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 3-4 | -1.50 | 0.01 | 46% | 1499 | +43.4 |
| 23 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 3-5 | -2.52 | 0.23 | 43% | 1431 | -32.6 |
| 24 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 3-4 | -2.71 | -0.88 | 42% | 1432 | -23.9 |
| 25 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 2-5 | -4.05 | -0.01 | 38% | 1415 | -13.1 |
| 26 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 2-5 | -4.22 | -3.35 | 38% | 1405 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 0-7 | -5.71 | 1.30 | 34% | 1361 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 2-6 | -6.15 | 1.21 | 33% | 1363 | -8.6 |
| 29 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 1-6 | -6.22 | 1.25 | 33% | 1340 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 1-7 | -6.54 | 2.18 | 32% | 1339 | -13.9 |
| 31 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 1-6 | -8.39 | 0.88 | 27% | 1293 | -27.6 |
| 32 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 1-7 | -9.29 | -0.96 | 25% | 1312 | +27.6 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 0.26 | Indianapolis Colts6.47 |
| NFC | 16 | -0.26 | New Orleans Saints8.13 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Carolina Panthers+43.41499
- Houston Texans+32.61540
- St. Louis Rams+27.61312
- Baltimore Ravens+26.71604
- Minnesota Vikings+25.61618
Fallers
- Arizona Cardinals-43.41543
- Buffalo Bills-32.61431
- Detroit Lions-27.61293
- Denver Broncos-26.71562
- Green Bay Packers-25.61507
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games