NFL · power ratings · 2007 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2007-10-29
- Games absorbed
- 116
- season to date · 13 this week
- Home field
- 1.05
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 8-0 | 11.80 | -0.11 | 80% | 1743 | +10.2 |
| 2 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 7-0 | 9.62 | -0.14 | 76% | 1733 | +20.0 |
| 3 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 5-2 | 5.32 | -1.89 | 65% | 1605 | +21.8 |
| 4 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 6-1 | 4.64 | -0.09 | 63% | 1586 | 0.0 |
| 5 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 4-3 | 4.53 | 0.94 | 63% | 1606 | +14.6 |
| 6 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 5-2 | 3.27 | 0.44 | 59% | 1575 | +6.4 |
| 7 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 6-1 | 2.36 | 0.75 | 57% | 1577 | +18.6 |
| 8 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 6-2 | 2.25 | -1.47 | 56% | 1559 | +6.3 |
| 9 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 5-2 | 1.90 | 0.03 | 56% | 1550 | +6.3 |
| 10 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 3-4 | 1.07 | -0.28 | 53% | 1517 | +21.2 |
| 11 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 4-3 | 0.24 | -2.29 | 51% | 1504 | 0.0 |
| 12 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 4-3 | 0.23 | -3.46 | 51% | 1544 | 0.0 |
| 13 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 3-4 | 0.02 | 2.08 | 50% | 1518 | +22.1 |
| 14 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 4-3 | -0.06 | 1.15 | 50% | 1484 | -10.2 |
| 15 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 3-5 | -0.26 | 0.98 | 49% | 1486 | -33.1 |
| 16 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 2-5 | -0.35 | 1.74 | 49% | 1464 | -21.8 |
| 17 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 4-3 | -0.41 | -0.06 | 49% | 1528 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 4-4 | -0.74 | 0.35 | 48% | 1478 | -6.4 |
| 19 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 3-4 | -0.79 | 3.01 | 48% | 1467 | -18.6 |
| 20 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 4-3 | -1.15 | -1.52 | 47% | 1508 | -20.0 |
| 21 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 3-4 | -1.39 | -0.27 | 46% | 1499 | +30.4 |
| 22 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 5-2 | -1.42 | -0.83 | 46% | 1483 | +33.1 |
| 23 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 2-5 | -1.48 | 0.22 | 46% | 1420 | -21.2 |
| 24 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 4-3 | -1.69 | -0.01 | 45% | 1468 | +19.0 |
| 25 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 3-5 | -2.08 | 1.08 | 44% | 1439 | -14.6 |
| 26 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 1-7 | -3.31 | 1.29 | 40% | 1391 | -22.1 |
| 27 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 3-4 | -3.32 | -1.57 | 40% | 1449 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 2-5 | -4.08 | -0.37 | 38% | 1374 | -6.3 |
| 29 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 1-6 | -4.43 | 0.19 | 37% | 1376 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 0-8 | -4.70 | 0.93 | 37% | 1352 | -6.3 |
| 31 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 2-5 | -7.31 | -0.71 | 30% | 1373 | -30.4 |
| 32 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 0-8 | -8.28 | -1.14 | 27% | 1344 | -19.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 1.21 | New England Patriots11.80 |
| NFC | 16 | -1.21 | Dallas Cowboys4.64 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Detroit Lions+33.11483
- New Orleans Saints+30.41499
- Buffalo Bills+22.11518
- Pittsburgh Steelers+21.81605
- Philadelphia Eagles+21.21517
Fallers
- Chicago Bears-33.11486
- San Francisco 49ers-30.41373
- New York Jets-22.11391
- Cincinnati Bengals-21.81464
- Minnesota Vikings-21.21420
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games