NFL · power ratings · 2006 week 8
What we knew after week 8
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2006-10-30
- Games absorbed
- 114
- season to date · 14 this week
- Home field
- 2.06
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 5-2 | 6.56 | -1.52 | 68% | 1619 | +12.9 |
| 2 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 7-0 | 6.55 | -0.03 | 68% | 1680 | +15.7 |
| 3 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 6-1 | 6.17 | -0.32 | 67% | 1672 | +30.1 |
| 4 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 5-2 | 5.26 | 1.40 | 65% | 1609 | +11.8 |
| 5 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 5-2 | 5.15 | 0.96 | 65% | 1628 | -15.7 |
| 6 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 7-0 | 4.96 | -3.13 | 64% | 1640 | +8.0 |
| 7 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 4-3 | 2.84 | 0.82 | 58% | 1547 | -15.0 |
| 8 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 5-2 | 2.77 | 0.03 | 58% | 1561 | +28.8 |
| 9 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 4-3 | 2.63 | -0.24 | 58% | 1537 | +43.7 |
| 10 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 2-5 | 2.63 | 0.83 | 58% | 1555 | -32.3 |
| 11 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 4-3 | 2.12 | 0.70 | 56% | 1549 | +23.9 |
| 12 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 4-4 | 1.92 | -1.11 | 56% | 1485 | -23.9 |
| 13 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 5-2 | 1.42 | 0.16 | 54% | 1530 | +15.0 |
| 14 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 4-3 | 1.27 | 0.74 | 54% | 1553 | +18.1 |
| 15 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 4-3 | 0.55 | -0.23 | 52% | 1537 | -18.1 |
| 16 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 4-3 | 0.26 | 0.46 | 51% | 1532 | -30.1 |
| 17 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 4-4 | -0.04 | 0.38 | 50% | 1511 | -43.7 |
| 18 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 2-5 | -0.88 | 0.97 | 47% | 1479 | 0.0 |
| 19 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 5-2 | -1.22 | -0.32 | 46% | 1471 | -28.8 |
| 20 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 4-4 | -1.86 | -0.48 | 45% | 1455 | -22.1 |
| 21 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 4-3 | -2.23 | -1.16 | 44% | 1470 | -12.9 |
| 22 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 2-5 | -2.38 | 0.96 | 43% | 1433 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 2-5 | -2.39 | 1.85 | 43% | 1443 | -11.8 |
| 24 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 3-4 | -2.62 | -1.65 | 42% | 1448 | +18.2 |
| 25 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 2-5 | -3.30 | 0.44 | 41% | 1421 | +22.1 |
| 26 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 1-6 | -3.85 | -1.15 | 39% | 1406 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 2-5 | -3.97 | 0.44 | 39% | 1392 | +16.6 |
| 28 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 2-5 | -4.53 | 0.18 | 37% | 1396 | +32.3 |
| 29 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 1-6 | -5.17 | -0.47 | 35% | 1358 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 1-7 | -5.97 | -0.97 | 33% | 1351 | -18.2 |
| 31 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 2-5 | -6.05 | 0.65 | 33% | 1374 | -16.6 |
| 32 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 2-5 | -6.59 | 0.28 | 32% | 1358 | -8.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 0.63 | San Diego Chargers6.56 |
| NFC | 16 | -0.63 | New York Giants5.26 |
Week 8 movers
Risers
- Dallas Cowboys+43.71537
- Oakland Raiders+32.31396
- New England Patriots+30.11672
- Baltimore Ravens+28.81561
- Jacksonville Jaguars+23.91549
Fallers
- Carolina Panthers-43.71511
- Pittsburgh Steelers-32.31555
- Minnesota Vikings-30.11532
- New Orleans Saints-28.81471
- Philadelphia Eagles-23.91485
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games