NFL · power ratings · 2003 week 8

What we knew after week 8

Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.

Teams rated
32
through 2003-10-27
Games absorbed
116
season to date · 14 this week
Home field
1.32
points, the model's estimate this week

Team ratings

NFL power ratings after week 8 of 2003 — SRS, strength of schedule and Elo for every rated team.
#TeamConfRecSRSSOSWin%EloΔ Elo
1Tampa Bay BuccaneersTBNFC4-36.380.0568%1637+14.9
2Kansas City ChiefsKCAFC8-06.21-0.6167%1660+15.5
3Tennessee TitansTENAFC6-24.74-0.3663%1636+14.2
4Miami DolphinsMIAAFC5-24.64-1.3863%1599+13.7
5Indianapolis ColtsINDAFC6-14.390.1063%1605+6.6
6New England PatriotsNEAFC6-23.521.0160%1612+8.7
7St. Louis RamsSTLNFC5-23.25-1.2359%1585+22.8
8Denver BroncosDENAFC5-32.91-0.7058%1551-34.3
9Minnesota VikingsMINNFC6-12.31-1.2357%1556-40.7
10Green Bay PackersGBNFC3-41.93-0.8256%15140.0
11Philadelphia EaglesPHINFC4-31.671.0055%1568+13.9
12Baltimore RavensBALAFC4-31.15-1.1553%1522+34.3
13San Francisco 49ersSFNFC3-50.96-0.8053%1514-20.1
14Carolina PanthersCARNFC6-10.830.8152%1537+15.1
15New York GiantsNYGNFC3-40.621.7252%1523+40.7
16Seattle SeahawksSEANFC5-20.40-1.4851%1526-17.8
17Buffalo BillsBUFAFC4-40.160.6950%1488-15.5
18Oakland RaidersOAKAFC2-50.140.0450%15020.0
19New York JetsNYJAFC2-5-0.280.1449%1492-13.9
20Dallas CowboysDALNFC5-2-0.75-1.2648%1504-14.9
21Cleveland BrownsCLEAFC3-5-0.840.1048%1459-8.7
22New Orleans SaintsNONFC3-5-0.90-0.4247%1473-15.1
23Pittsburgh SteelersPITAFC2-5-1.381.9546%1445-22.8
24Washington RedskinsWASNFC3-4-2.611.1342%14540.0
25Cincinnati BengalsCINAFC3-4-3.760.3639%1419+17.8
26Jacksonville JaguarsJAXAFC1-6-3.880.7139%1391-14.2
27Atlanta FalconsATLNFC1-6-4.131.2238%13950.0
28San Diego ChargersSDAFC1-6-4.201.4838%1392-13.7
29Chicago BearsCHINFC2-5-4.80-0.1736%1390+15.3
30Houston TexansHOUAFC2-5-5.612.1334%1367-6.6
31Detroit LionsDETNFC1-6-6.08-0.6433%1322-15.3
32Arizona CardinalsARINFC2-5-7.010.1330%1362+20.1

Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.

Conference strength

Mean SRS by conference after week 8 of 2003.
ConferenceTeamsAvg SRSBest team
AFC160.49Kansas City Chiefs6.21
NFC16-0.49Tampa Bay Buccaneers6.38

Week 8 movers

Risers

  • New York Giants+40.71523
  • Baltimore Ravens+34.31522
  • St. Louis Rams+22.81585
  • Arizona Cardinals+20.11362
  • Cincinnati Bengals+17.81419

Fallers

  • Minnesota Vikings-40.71556
  • Denver Broncos-34.31551
  • Pittsburgh Steelers-22.81445
  • San Francisco 49ers-20.11514
  • Seattle Seahawks-17.81526

Methodology

SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.

Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.

These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.

Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”

Fitted constants

elo_carry
0.55
elo_epoch_season
1999
elo_hfa
60
elo_k
20
elo_points_per_elo
0.04
margin_cap
17
min_games_to_rank
3
prior_weight
2
ridge
4
srs_carry
0.8

Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games