NFL · power ratings · 2002 week 8

What we knew after week 8

Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.

Teams rated
32
through 2002-10-28
Games absorbed
116
season to date · 14 this week
Home field
2.20
points, the model's estimate this week

Team ratings

NFL power ratings after week 8 of 2002 — SRS, strength of schedule and Elo for every rated team.
#TeamConfRecSRSSOSWin%EloΔ Elo
1Philadelphia EaglesPHINFC5-26.45-1.2768%1650+10.3
2Tampa Bay BuccaneersTBNFC6-25.630.3566%1609+8.3
3Green Bay PackersGBNFC6-14.50-0.8463%16440.0
4Oakland RaidersOAKAFC4-34.190.4062%1546-25.8
5Denver BroncosDENAFC6-23.711.6061%1589+26.4
6Pittsburgh SteelersPITAFC4-33.430.0960%1599+29.4
7New Orleans SaintsNONFC6-23.350.9760%1565-16.9
8San Francisco 49ersSFNFC5-23.060.2459%1583+14.4
9Miami DolphinsMIAAFC5-22.56-0.4357%15460.0
10St. Louis RamsSTLNFC2-52.441.2557%15510.0
11San Diego ChargersSDAFC6-12.33-0.6057%15580.0
12Kansas City ChiefsKCAFC4-41.671.3855%1515+25.8
13New England PatriotsNEAFC3-41.462.1954%1535-26.4
14Baltimore RavensBALAFC3-40.941.4553%1515-29.4
15Atlanta FalconsATLNFC4-30.25-0.1251%1501+16.9
16Jacksonville JaguarsJAXAFC3-40.14-0.3150%1478-17.1
17Cleveland BrownsCLEAFC4-4-0.45-0.9349%1486+16.1
18Indianapolis ColtsINDAFC4-3-0.48-1.2049%1495-17.2
19Arizona CardinalsARINFC4-3-1.52-0.8746%1482-14.4
20Buffalo BillsBUFAFC5-3-1.65-1.1545%1508+10.6
21New York GiantsNYGNFC3-4-1.680.6445%1459-10.3
22Washington RedskinsWASNFC3-4-1.771.8345%1482+17.2
23Carolina PanthersCARNFC3-5-1.84-0.3145%1399-8.3
24Chicago BearsCHINFC2-5-2.46-0.9443%1442-33.5
25Tennessee TitansTENAFC3-4-2.56-0.4543%1472+14.2
26Seattle SeahawksSEANFC2-5-2.83-0.1442%1441+17.3
27New York JetsNYJAFC2-5-2.87-0.0542%1442-16.1
28Dallas CowboysDALNFC3-5-3.36-0.8640%1419-17.3
29Minnesota VikingsMINNFC2-5-4.09-2.7138%1408+33.5
30Detroit LionsDETNFC2-5-4.880.0536%1377-10.6
31Houston TexansHOUAFC2-5-5.330.4335%1409+17.1
32Cincinnati BengalsCINAFC0-7-8.351.1627%1298-14.2

Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.

Conference strength

Mean SRS by conference after week 8 of 2002.
ConferenceTeamsAvg SRSBest team
AFC16-0.08Oakland Raiders4.19
NFC160.08Philadelphia Eagles6.45

Week 8 movers

Risers

  • Minnesota Vikings+33.51408
  • Pittsburgh Steelers+29.41599
  • Denver Broncos+26.41589
  • Kansas City Chiefs+25.81515
  • Seattle Seahawks+17.31441

Fallers

  • Chicago Bears-33.51442
  • Baltimore Ravens-29.41515
  • New England Patriots-26.41535
  • Oakland Raiders-25.81546
  • Dallas Cowboys-17.31419

Methodology

SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.

Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.

These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.

Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 8.”

Fitted constants

elo_carry
0.55
elo_epoch_season
1999
elo_hfa
60
elo_k
20
elo_points_per_elo
0.04
margin_cap
17
min_games_to_rank
3
prior_weight
2
ridge
4
srs_carry
0.8

Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games