NFL · power ratings · 2002 week 19
What we knew after week 19
Two rating systems over the same games — a ridge-regularized SRS that solves for the schedule, and a margin-aware Elo that walks it forward one week at a time. Every number on this page uses only the games played by this week: no later result touches it, which is what makes an old week worth reading at all.
- Teams rated
- 32
- through 2003-01-12
- Games absorbed
- 264
- season to date · 4 this week
- Home field
- 2.06
- points, the model's estimate this week
Team ratings
| # | Team | Conf | Rec | SRS | SOS | Win% | Elo | Δ Elo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakland RaidersOAK | AFC | 12-5 | 7.03 | 0.79 | 70% | 1679 | +21.3 |
| 2 | Philadelphia EaglesPHI | NFC | 13-4 | 6.78 | -0.88 | 69% | 1688 | +13.4 |
| 3 | Tampa Bay BuccaneersTB | NFC | 13-4 | 6.28 | -0.31 | 68% | 1652 | +18.4 |
| 4 | Miami DolphinsMIA | AFC | 9-7 | 2.73 | 0.27 | 58% | 1537 | 0.0 |
| 5 | Denver BroncosDEN | AFC | 9-7 | 2.49 | 0.97 | 57% | 1541 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Pittsburgh SteelersPIT | AFC | 11-6-1 | 2.42 | -0.03 | 57% | 1593 | -10.2 |
| 7 | New York JetsNYJ | AFC | 10-8 | 2.31 | 0.73 | 57% | 1600 | -21.3 |
| 8 | Green Bay PackersGB | NFC | 12-5 | 2.21 | -0.73 | 56% | 1565 | 0.0 |
| 9 | Tennessee TitansTEN | AFC | 12-5 | 2.08 | -0.25 | 56% | 1636 | +10.2 |
| 10 | Atlanta FalconsATL | NFC | 10-7-1 | 1.53 | 0.24 | 54% | 1547 | -13.4 |
| 11 | Kansas City ChiefsKC | AFC | 8-8 | 1.47 | 1.13 | 54% | 1517 | 0.0 |
| 12 | New Orleans SaintsNO | NFC | 9-7 | 1.41 | -0.32 | 54% | 1498 | 0.0 |
| 13 | New England PatriotsNE | AFC | 9-7 | 1.30 | 0.74 | 54% | 1548 | 0.0 |
| 14 | St. Louis RamsSTL | NFC | 7-9 | 0.88 | 0.20 | 53% | 1526 | 0.0 |
| 15 | New York GiantsNYG | NFC | 10-7 | 0.83 | -0.44 | 52% | 1568 | 0.0 |
| 16 | San Francisco 49ersSF | NFC | 11-7 | 0.81 | 0.63 | 52% | 1529 | -18.4 |
| 17 | Indianapolis ColtsIND | AFC | 10-7 | 0.47 | -0.25 | 51% | 1513 | 0.0 |
| 18 | Cleveland BrownsCLE | AFC | 9-8 | 0.43 | -0.07 | 51% | 1499 | 0.0 |
| 19 | Jacksonville JaguarsJAX | AFC | 6-10 | -0.12 | -0.43 | 50% | 1448 | 0.0 |
| 20 | Baltimore RavensBAL | AFC | 7-9 | -0.54 | -0.02 | 48% | 1478 | 0.0 |
| 21 | San Diego ChargersSD | AFC | 8-8 | -0.89 | 0.57 | 47% | 1437 | 0.0 |
| 22 | Seattle SeahawksSEA | NFC | 7-9 | -1.20 | 0.22 | 47% | 1507 | 0.0 |
| 23 | Buffalo BillsBUF | AFC | 8-8 | -1.31 | -0.05 | 46% | 1487 | 0.0 |
| 24 | Washington RedskinsWAS | NFC | 7-9 | -1.86 | 0.11 | 45% | 1466 | 0.0 |
| 25 | Carolina PanthersCAR | NFC | 7-9 | -2.17 | -0.41 | 44% | 1440 | 0.0 |
| 26 | Minnesota VikingsMIN | NFC | 6-10 | -2.61 | -0.22 | 42% | 1434 | 0.0 |
| 27 | Chicago BearsCHI | NFC | 4-12 | -3.51 | 0.39 | 40% | 1390 | 0.0 |
| 28 | Dallas CowboysDAL | NFC | 5-11 | -4.51 | -0.32 | 37% | 1373 | 0.0 |
| 29 | Arizona CardinalsARI | NFC | 5-11 | -5.09 | 0.24 | 36% | 1348 | 0.0 |
| 30 | Houston TexansHOU | AFC | 4-12 | -5.95 | -0.07 | 33% | 1354 | 0.0 |
| 31 | Detroit LionsDET | NFC | 3-13 | -6.33 | -0.33 | 32% | 1303 | 0.0 |
| 32 | Cincinnati BengalsCIN | AFC | 2-14 | -7.38 | 0.37 | 30% | 1301 | 0.0 |
Ranks are competition ranks — tied teams share a rank and the next rank skips. SRS is points per game against an average schedule; 0.0 is exactly average. Win% is the expected win rate against an average opponent on a neutral field.
Conference strength
| Conference | Teams | Avg SRS | Best team |
|---|---|---|---|
| AFC | 16 | 0.41 | Oakland Raiders7.03 |
| NFC | 16 | -0.41 | Philadelphia Eagles6.78 |
Week 19 movers
Risers
- Oakland Raiders+21.31679
- Tampa Bay Buccaneers+18.41652
- Philadelphia Eagles+13.41688
- Tennessee Titans+10.21636
Fallers
- New York Jets-21.31600
- San Francisco 49ers-18.41529
- Atlanta Falcons-13.41547
- Pittsburgh Steelers-10.21593
Methodology
SRS is a ridge-regularized simultaneous solve: every team’s rating is its average scoring margin adjusted for the ratings of everyone it played, with margins capped so a single blowout cannot dominate a season. Elo walks the schedule forward one game at a time from a fixed 1999 epoch. Between seasons it keeps 55% of each team’s distance from average and regresses the rest back toward the middle — last season is evidence, not a starting point. They are independent systems over the same games, published side by side because they disagree in informative ways.
Every board is cut through its own week — it absorbs the games played by that week and nothing later. That is what makes an old week worth reading: it is what was knowable at the time, not a retrospective re-rating. The hindsight companion shows how far these ratings sat from what the finished season says was true.
These do not beat the market. On the held-out 2018-2025 seasons — 2,227 games the constants were never tuned on — Elo predicts game margin at 10.236 MAE and SRS at 10.295 (over its 2,099 games; SRS produces nothing in week 1), against 9.829 for the closing line. Read them as a description of what teams have done, not as a price.
Two families of column in the underlying artifact are deliberately not published here: a normalized srs_z, which divides by the season’s final spread and so would let a week-5 z-score know how the season ended, and the per-season era descriptives, which are season-final by construction. Neither can honestly appear on a board labelled “after week 19.”
Fitted constants
- elo_carry
- 0.55
- elo_epoch_season
- 1999
- elo_hfa
- 60
- elo_k
- 20
- elo_points_per_elo
- 0.04
- margin_cap
- 17
- min_games_to_rank
- 3
- prior_weight
- 2
- ridge
- 4
- srs_carry
- 0.8
Sources: nfl_schedules, nfl_teams · built 2026-07-30 · seasons 1999–2025 · a team is rated after 3 games